Department of Parking and Traffic_Section 7
|
In 1993 the Budget Analyst conducted a comprehensive performance audit of the City-Owned Parking Garages which contained 35 recommendations. As part of this current performance audit of the Department of Parking and Traffic, we reviewed the current status of findings and recommendations contained in the Budget Analyst"s 1993 performance audit. Those findings and recommendations which we determined are still relevant to the operations of the parking garages today are described in this section, along with new recommendations.
Overview
There are currently eighteen City-owned parking garages in San Francisco. The facilities provided a total of approximately 14,600 parking spaces. In FY 1997-98, gross receipts totaled approximately $51.8 million, including Parking Tax revenues of $9.3 million and Gross Receipts Tax revenues of $4.3 million, and garage revenues of $38.2 million. Expenses to operate the garages were approximately $15.9 million and $4.6 million was deposited into the garages leased to non-profit corporations" capital accounts, therefore net City income from the parking garages was $31.3 million. Of the $31.3 million, MUNI received $7.7 million, DPT received $3.4 million, the Recreation and Park Department received $6.6 million, and $13.6 million was deposited in the City"s General Fund.
Between FY 1994-95 and FY 1997-98 overall gross receipts at the parking garages have increased by 33 percent, while the proportion of overall expenses has declined from approximately 40 percent to 31 percent of total gross receipts. Table 7.1 on the following page compares the increase in gross receipts by parking facility for those garages which were in operation in both FY 1994-95 and FY 1997-98. Table 7.1 Comparison of Selected City-Owned Parking Garages Gross Receipts, FY 1994-95 and FY 1997-98 Â
Leased to Non-profits | FY 1994-95 Gross Receipts | FY 1997-98 Gross Receipts | % Change |
Ellis & O"Farrell | $3,314,760 | $4,249,144 | 28% |
Fifth & Mission | 5,679,631 | 8,028,418 | 41% |
Japan Center | 1,845,276 | 2,213,126 | 20% |
Portsmouth Square | 2,665,417 | 3,179,434 | 19% |
Sutter-Stockton | 7,433,968 | 10,202,000 | 37% Â |
Subtotal  | $20,939,052 | $27,872,122 | 33% |
Direct Operation | |||
Civic Center | $1,227,927 | $1,881,245 | 53% |
Golden Gateway | 3,260,121 | 4,131,454 | 27% |
Lombard Street | 821,552 | 945,854 | 15% |
Mission-Bartlett | 386,852 | 501,739 | 30% |
Moscone Center | 1,260,466 | 1,573,671 | 25% |
Performing Arts | 1,063,038 | 1,181,756 | 11% |
Polk-Bush | 225,095 | 365,299 | 62% |
St. Mary"s Square | 3,956,089 | 3,987,235 | 1% |
Union Square | 4,707,348 | 6,005,611 | 28% |
Vallejo Street | 787,753 | 963,714 | 22% |
1660 Mission Street | 27,430 | 57,947 | 111% Â |
Subtotal | 22% Â | ||
Total | $38,662,723 | $49,467,647 | 28% |
The City contracts directly with the operators of 13 of the 18 parking facilities and leases five of them to non-profit corporations. The organizational structure of the City"s parking facilities is complex, and differs for each facility depending upon how construction was financed, which City department held title to the property on which the facility was built, and when the facility was built.
The garages leased to non-profit corporations are headed by boards of directors, typically composed of business owners from the area surrounding the garage. Each of the non-profit corporations was formed to issue revenue bonds to finance the construction of the parking garages. Because the non-profit corporation bonds are tax exempt, their interest rates were reasonably comparable to rates for tax exempt government bonds. Thus the cost to debt finance the construction of the garages was almost as cost effective as if the City had issued bonds directly. However, the revenue bonds did not limit the credit of or become direct obligations of the City.
The respective non-profit corporations contract with a parking operator to provide staff and other services for operation of the garage. For these services, the non-profit corporation pays the operating company a fixed management fee in addition to reimbursement for all operating expenses. The Parking and Traffic Commission reviews the non-profit corporations" annual garage operation budget proposals, and makes budget recommendations to the Controller who has the authority to approve the budgets. The Commission also makes recommendations to the Board of Supervisors regarding individual garage rates and hours of operation.
The direct operation garages involve fewer individuals and agencies. First, there is no non-profit corporate intermediary between the City and the garage operating company. Instead, DPT contracts directly with the operating companies. Second, all operators for the direct operation garages, with one exception, provide garage operations at a fixed rate instead of on a fee plus operating expense reimbursement basis. In other words, the operating company is responsible for paying operating expenses, and its total contractual compensation is presumed to cover expenses and profit. For this reason, the direct operation garages do not submit budgets or reimbursement requests to the Controller for approval.
Accomplishments
Recommendations from the 1993 Performance Audit that have been implemented by the Parking and Traffic Commission, DPT, and non-profit garage corporations, as well as other accomplishments since the prior audit was conducted, include the following:
- DPT has revised the Moscone Center and Polk-Bush management contracts to require annual revenue audits;
- The Parking and Traffic Commission has adopted a resolution establishing a policy of bidding non-profit corporations" garage operator contracts at least every five years;
- DPT has begun to include detailed maintenance and other performance specifications in all new operator agreements;
- DPT has arranged for the scheduled repayment of $538,832 in back payments and a $500,000 construction loan from Portsmouth Plaza Corporation;
- DPT and the non-profit corporations have implemented recommendations concerning agreements with attorneys and legal fees;
- DPT has established a 180-day parking garage trial rate in order to measure the effects of changes in fees on garage revenue and usage;
- DPT is moving forward to improve the marketing of City-owned garages by recently securing a gift of $140,000 gift from several nonprofit garage corporations which will be used by the Off-Street Parking Division to hire a consultant to conduct a garage marketing study and prepare a marketing plan for all of the facilities;
- DPT has hired an assistant director as well as a management assistant to maintain and manage all City-owned garages and parking lots; and
- DPT has moved forward with (a) making improvements and renovations to the Union Square and St. Mary"s Square Garages; (b) construction of a new North Beach garage; (c) exploring the development of new garages in the Tenderloin and Fillmore neighborhoods; and (d) expansion of other existing facilities.
Direct Operation Garages
The City oversees thirteen direct operation parking facilities through competitive bidding of operator contracts and compliance monitoring. Today, leases govern three of the direct operation garages. The garage operators that lease these garages make a monthly rental payment to the City based on a percentage of gross monthly revenues, subject to a minimum rent amount. The remaining ten garages are run according to a management-type operator contracts. The garage operators deposit all daily revenues in a City revenue account. The operators are paid by the City at the end of each month. Some operator contracts base the operator payment on a percentage of gross monthly revenues. Others provide the operator with a flat monthly fee, potentially supplemented by a percentage of gross excess revenues, if revenues reach a target level. Table 7.2 on shows the current status of the direct operation parking facilities. Table 7.2 Direct Operation Parking Facilities
# of spaces | Operator | Expiration of Contract | Type of payment | |
Leases | ||||
Union Square | 1,030 | City Park Management | Expired 5/96, currently mo. to mo. | Management fee based on % of gross. |
Mission-Bartlett | 350 | S+F Parking/MEDA | Expired 8/96, currently mo. to mo. | Management fee based on % of gross. |
Golden Gateway | 1,095 | Five Star Parking | Expired 9/96, currently mo. to mo. | Management fee based on % of gross. |
Management Type Operator Contracts | ||||
Civic Center | 840 | Ampco Systems Parking | Expired 8/97, currently mo. to mo. | Flat management fee, plus reimbursement for operating costs. |
Polk-Bush | 129 | City Parking Co. | Expired 3/98, currently mo. to mo. | Management fee w/% gross incentive. |
Vallejo Street | 163 | City Parking Co. | Expired 8/98, currently mo. to mo. | Management fee based on % of gross. |
1660 Mission St. | 59 | Convenient Parking Co. | 3/99 | Flat management fee. |
Performing Arts | 612 | ABC Parking | 1/00 | Management fee w/% gross incentive. |
Moscone Center | 732 | ABC Parking | 2/00 | Management fee w/% gross incentive. |
St. Mary"s Square | 828 | PCI/Daja Inc. | 3/00 | Flat management fee. |
Lombard Street | 205 | Pacific Park Management | 4/01 | Management fee based on % of gross. |
S.F. General Hospital | 1,701 | Pacific Park Management | 6/03 | Flat management fee. |
North Beach | 82 | Under construction | -Â | -Â |
Conversion of Leases to Management-Type Operator Contracts
At the time of the 1993 Audit, as leases with garage operators expired, the City was in the process of converting all of the direct operation garages from leases to management-type operator contracts. The main disadvantage of a lease, from the standpoint of the City, is that it confers a right of possession on the operations company. If an operator refuses to turn over a garage after notification that the City has found it in default of some provision of the lease, the City would have to file a court action to retain possession of the garage. With a management-type operator contract, the operator could be removed after a 30-day notice period, without the need for expensive legal action. Although an operator has never been forcibly removed, the City Attorney"s Office has advised that potential legal costs alone warrant a transition to management-type operator contracts.
Another advantage of the management-type operator contract is improved revenue control. Under a such a contract, daily revenues are deposited in a City revenue account, under the supervision of the Department Parking and Traffic and the Department of Real Estate. Under a lease, operators deposit daily revenues in their own accounts, and pay the City at the end of the month.
At the time of the 1993 Audit, DPT advised that all leases upon expiration would be converted to management-type operator contracts. Two garages (Lombard Street and Performing Arts Garage) have been converted since that time. However, as shown in Table 7.2 above, the remaining leased garages (Golden Gateway, Mission-Bartlett, and Union Square) have been operating on a month-to-month basis since their leases expired in 1996 and have not yet been converted to management-type operator contracts.
DPT advises that the three remaining leases have not been converted to management-type operator contracts because they have been unable to devote the staff time required to competitively bid the contracts due to limited staff and competing priorities. The Budget Analyst believes that in order to ensure that the City is obtaining the best possible service and rates, these leases should be converted to management-type operator contracts and competitively bid immediately.
Inclusion of Detailed Performance Specifications in Operator Contracts
In the 1993 Audit, we recommended that operator contracts should be based on a percentage of gross revenue, rather than a fixed fee, when legally and financially feasible. In order to discourage operators from cutting services in order to increase profits, we recommended that detailed performance specifications, with penalty clauses, should be included in all operator contracts. Such specifications could include those covering garage personnel, security, maintenance and signage.
Since the 1993 Audit was performed, DPT has begun including detailed maintenance schedules in all of its new operator contracts. DPT has also made some progress in including in its new operator contracts specification of other key aspects of garage operations such as security, staff training, facility signage, and guidelines for the number of entry and exit lanes open at peak and non-peak hours. Most recently, an Invitation to Bid for the Civic Center Garage operator contract included a minimum staff schedule, quantified staff salaries and duties. This more detailed Invitation to Bid was released after a prior bid process produced unsatisfactory bids and all bids were rejected. Specification of such details and the inclusion of penalty clauses for non-compliance in operator contracts provide DPT contract monitors with more effective ways to maintain standards of service in the garages. As operator contracts expire, DPT should continue to work to include more detailed performance specifications in each new operator contract.
Garages Leased to Non-Profit Corporations
The City currently leases five garages to non-profit corporations (see Table 7.3). The City entered into long term leases with the non-profit garage corporations at the time the corporations were formed. Over the years, the leases have been revised when a garage issued new bonds to finance expansion, or when a garage retired the debt from its original bond financing. The leases specify that the City can set and change parking rates and garage operating hours at any time, as long as the rates will produce enough revenues to make payments on outstanding debt, cover reserve requirements and to reimburse the operators for their budgeted operating expenses.
The non-profit corporations contract with professional garage operators for day-to-day management and operation of the garages. Members of their boards of directors include local business leaders who, in many cases, take an active interest in garage performance and serve as the City"s on-site quality assurance inspectors for the garages they control. Board members informally spot-check garage cleanliness, waiting lines and other matters.
Table 7.3 lists the garages leased to non-profit corporations, their operators (with whom the non-profit corporation contracts for day-to-day management and operations), and the annual fee paid to each operator. Table 7.3 Operators of Garages Leased to Non-Profit Corporations (All operators are under month-to-month agreements)
Garage and Name of Non-profit Corporation | # of spaces | Operator | Annual Management Fee |
Ellis & O"Farrell Ellis-O"Farrell Parking Corp. | 925 | Ampco Systems Parking | $18,750 plus Supervisory Fee of $27,600 Â |
Fifth & Mission Downtown Parking Corp. | 2,622 | City Park Management | $10,000 plus Supervisory Fee of $32,000 Â |
Japan Center Western Addition Parking Corp. | 850 | Ampco Systems Parking | $15,000 plus Supervisory Fee of $28,452 Â |
Portsmouth Square Portsmouth Plaza Parking Corp. Â | 504 | City Park Management | $10,000 Â |
Sutter-Stockton Uptown Parking Corp. | 1,865 | Ampco Systems Parking | $10,000 plus Supervisory Fee of $22,000 |
Non-profit Corporations" Garage Operator Contracts
The non-profit corporations do not directly manage the garages. Instead, they contract with professional garage operators. None of the operator contracts for the garages have been competitively bid since the terms of the original agreements were negotiated 30 to 40 years ago. Instead, compensation of operators is based on historical custom or a consultant"s analysis. In 1993 we recommended that each non-profit should establish a schedule for putting its operator contract out to bid every three to five years. Subsequently finding that the non-profit corporations" garage operator contracts had not yet been competitively bid, the 1997-98 San Francisco Civil Grand Jury Report recommended that such contracts be put out to bid immediately.
After the 1997-98 Grand Jury issued its recommendation, the Parking and Traffic Commission adopted a resolution establishing a policy of bidding non-profit corporations" garage operator contracts at least every five years. DPT advises that it is now preparing for competitive bids to operate two of the five garages leased to non-profit corporations. According to DPT, an Invitation to Bid for operation of the Japan Center and Ellis & O"Farrell garages will be issued in April 1999. DPT advises that the Fifth & Mission and Portsmouth Square operator contracts will be put out to bid within the next year and the remaining operator contract, for the Sutter-Stockton Garage, will be placed out to bid at a later date.
Inclusion of Operating Costs and Performance Specifications in the Non-Profit Corporations" Garage Operator Contracts
The City"s leases with the non-profit garage corporations require operating budget approval by the City Controller. The garage operator, the on-site manager and the non-profit corporation staff prepare the annual non-profit garage budgets. Proposed budgets must be approved first by the non-profit board of directors, after which they are submitted to the DPT. The Parking and Traffic Commission, in turn, transmits the proposed budgets to the Controller which voluntarily adopts the Parking and Traffic Commission"s recommendations regarding the non-profit corporations" garage budgets. The non-profit corporations submit request for reimbursement to the Controller two or three times a month. The Controller"s approval is necessary for either City or Trustee reimbursement.
The 1993 Audit determined that the primary tool for oversight of the City-owned garages which are leased to non-profit corporations - the garage budget - was ineffective. The budget approval process and the monitoring of the budgets by the Controller"s Office was inadequate at that time. Neither the Controller nor DPT felt that they had the staff to monitor garage spending actively. Today, DPT and the Controller"s Office report that the situation has greatly improved and that monitoring of operating expenditures is now closely examined by staff in the Controller"s Office. However, as stated in the 1993 Audit, we continue to believe that even under an improved budget approval process, the process produces less efficient results than would competitive bidding by non-profits of operator contracts at a fixed rate including operating expenses.
The existing operator contracts, which provide for a flat management fee and reimbursement of all operating expenses, should be converted to fixed rate operator contracts where the operator is responsible for paying operating expenses without receiving any additional reimbursement of such expenses by the City. In addition, when legally and financially feasible, such operator agreements should be based upon a percentage of gross revenues rather than a flat fee. To ensure that the quality of service provided by the operators remains high, we recommend that the non-profit garage corporations build performance specifications with penalty clauses into the operator contracts and monitor compliance with the specifications. In this way, the non-profit corporations could give the operators an inventive to reduce costs, by making them responsible for paying operating expenses, but establish a satisfactory level of service that the operators must meet.
Off Street Parking Division Staffing and Performance Monitoring
At the time of the 1993 Audit, the Off-Street Parking Division of DPT consisted of one professional staff (the Director of Off-Street Parking), a half-time accounting position, and a clerical position. In 1993 we recommended that a new professional position be added to the Division in order to develop more detailed performance specifications and to inspect each garage on a twice monthly basis. Two additional professional staff persons have been hired: one full-time Deputy Director was hired in July of 1995 and one full-time Management Assistant in May of 1998. DPT advises that the Management Assistant will eventually be responsible for inspections, however, due to training requirements and competing priorities, the Management Assistant has not yet begun conducting inspections of garages regularly. DPT advises that each garage is visited by a member of the Off-Street Parking Division on average one time per month. Twice monthly checklist inspections are needed to ensure that garages are maintained and operated at a reasonable standard of service.
Streamlining of Operator Contract Bid Process
DPT reports that the current garage operator contract bid process is excessively time consuming, taking approximately six months to complete the entire process. DPT states that it is unable to competitively bid all of parking garage operator contracts on a timely basis due to the amount of staff time required. As noted above, DPT is currently behind in competitively bidding its direct operator contracts as they expire and, furthermore, we recommend that all operator contracts for the garages leased to non-profit corporations also be placed out the bid immediately. Competitive bidding of contracts is necessary to ensure that the City is obtaining the best possible service and rates.
DPT should submit to the Board of Supervisors for consideration a proposed ordinance to streamline the bid process from six months to approximately four and one-half months. This would be accomplished by eliminating the requirement for approval of bid documents by the Board of Supervisors. Under the proposal, final approval of an operator contract would continue to be subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors. This would be consistent with the manner in which other City leases of real property are currently approved by the Board, which do not require prior Board action before approval.
Parking Rates
In FY 1997-98, the City collected a total of $31.2 million from City-owned garages that were deposited into various City Funds including the General Fund. The City has an interest in maximizing these parking related revenues and encouraging shopping in the City"s commercial districts while balancing that interest with the City"s Transit First policy. The goal of the Transit First Policy is to limit the number of commuters coming into and/or traveling around San Francisco by car. Adjusting parking rates is one tool available to the City to control the flow of traffic into and within the City. The higher the rates, the fewer people will drive into traffic congested areas, encouraging individuals to use public transportation.
The City does not have a uniform rate for its parking garages. Instead, the City establishes rates for each garage depending on the location and use of the garage, as well as the rates of surrounding garages. At the time of the 1993 Audit, in order for a City-owned garage to change its rates, it had to go through a three to four month approval process involving the Parking and Traffic Commission, the Board of Supervisors and the Mayor. This lengthy process hindered the ability of the garages to alter hourly rates on an experimental basis to measure the effect on demand for transient and monthly parking. The Budget Analyst recommended that the Mayor and Board of Supervisors permit DPT to adjust rates over a trial period, under the approval and oversight of the Parking and Traffic Commission.
In 1996, such an experimental rate change process was approved by the Board of Supervisors. Today, under the approval of the Parking and Traffic Commission, garages are permitted to alter parking rates for a trial period of 180 days. At the end of the 180-day trial period, the Parking and Traffic Commission is required to request authorization from the Board of Supervisors and the Mayor to establish permanent rates. At that time the DPT also reports to the Board the results of the trial rate changes with an analysis of their impact on the City"s revenues. To date, DPT reports that the trial rate process has been successful and utilized by several garages which have resulted in permanent rate changes.
Conclusion
DPT has implemented many of the recommendations contained in the Budget Analyst"s 1993 Performance Audit of the City-owned parking garages. Since 1994, parking garage revenues have increased, operating costs have been kept under control, and many improvements to the City-owned parking garages have been made. However, certain important recommendations from the 1993 Performance Audit have not yet been fully implemented.
This review found that DPT has not yet completed the conversion of leases to management-type operator contracts for all direct operation garages. In addition, DPT has fallen behind in competitively bidding garage operator contracts when they expire. With regard to the garages leased to non-profit corporations, the operator contracts for such garages have not been competitively bid in 30 to 40 years. Competitive bidding of operator contracts is necessary to ensure that the City is obtaining the best possible service and revenues. DPT advises that it is now moving forward with competitively bidding these operator contracts. DPT is developing performance specifications in its garage operating contracts and should continue to expand the type and detail of such specifications to obtain the desired standard of service at the best possible rate. Although additional staff have been hired and improvements have been made, DPT staff is not now conducting inspections of all garages on a regularly scheduled basis and utilizing performance checklists.
Recommendations
The Parking and Traffic Commission should:
7.2 Include detailed performance specifications, with penalty clauses, in all management contracts with all direct operation garage operators, covering garage personnel, security, maintenance, and signage.
7.3 Direct the DPT Off-Street Parking Division to monitor direct operation garage compliance with performance specifications through twice-monthly checklist inspections, and submit six month reports to the Parking and Traffic Commission on operator performance and revenues.
DPT together with the Non-profit Parking Corporations should:
7.5 Competitively bid the existing fixed rate operator contracts on a regular basis, at least every five years, starting immediately.
7.6 Include detailed performance specifications and reporting requirements with penalty clauses in all contracts with operators.
7.7 Direct staff to monitor compliance with performance specifications, and report to the Parking and Traffic Commission every six months on operator performance and revenues.
Costs/Benefits
Implementation of performance specifications and checklist inspections for all of the garages and implementation of a competitive bidding process for fixed rate contracts with the non-profit garage operators would achieve efficient garage operation, maintain satisfactory service levels, and maximize net revenues to the City.